Monday, May 25, 2009
WHAT ARE PROPER SUBGROUPS?
The question asks for the definition of proper subgroups. A subgroup of a group has the same number of elements of the group whose elements belong to, but a proper subgroups contains less number of element the main group contains. It is said that the order of the subgroup must divide the order of the main group. In the case the order of the subgroup and the order of the main group are the same then the set is simply called a subgroup of the group.
CLICK HERE FOR ORIGINAL PICTURE
Sunday, May 24, 2009
THERE ARE SUBGROUPS? REALLY?
Accordingly, a subgroup is a group itself. It can be the group itself or some other group with a less order and with all the elements contained in the main group and the order of the subgroup must less or equal the order of the main group. That is, the order of the subgroup must divide the order of the group. The important thing to remember here is that subgroups are themselves groups satisfying the four operations of groups. Fair enough for now.
GROUP EXPLORER
THIS ONE IS EASY OR SO IT SEEMS TO ME: THE ORDER OF A GROUP.
The order of a group is the number of elements in the group. The order of one of the elements in a group can be tricky to find unless we know the the group itself and the factorization of the group is also known--other wise forget it. I think we are talking about infinite groups here as opposed to finite ones. This one concept is easy enough for me to understand, however I can't wait to start finding the order of some groups and some elements of groups because I never understood before what my subtle professor was talking about during that unforgettable lecture on the order of groups and the order of the elements in a group.
AND NOW INTO THE TRIVIAL GROUP
The trivial group contains only one element. In the case of addition we have the zero group {0} and in multiplication we have the multiplicative group {1}.
BUT THEN WHAT IS A QUASIGROUP?
It is said that a quasigroup need not have an identity nor be associative. But what kind of monsters might quasigroups be? To name an example we can think of LATIN SQUARES in which multiplying any row or column you get the same product. This concept I have never hitherto contemplated and I can only now see the beauty of it. check it out.
Saturday, May 23, 2009
NOW WHAT IS ACTUALLY A SEMIGROUP?
As I read, a semigroup is nothing other than an associative groupoid. It is said that a semigroup does not have to have an identity. Now I am curious to know what is a groupoid and why there does not need to exist an identity element in a semigroup and what are they or how they look. As far as inverses is concern there need to be none. Thus the set of integers will not qualify here. for every element in the integers with the ecception of zero has an inverse and as we saw earlier, the set of the integers is a ring and futhermore an integral domain. So semigroups must be sets with no identity and no inverses. I am thinking of the set of natural numbers. Natural numbers have no inverses and we know that the associative propety will apply for addition. In the natural numbers there exist no identity for addition because the identity for addition is zero and zero only belongs to the whole nubmers, yet something else must a a semigroup with no inverses and no identity property. I will have to wait to see more on examples of semigroup to see their truly importance, but for now I am satisfy with how much I have undertood so far about groups, rings, semigroups, and on idempotents. My worry so far is knowing more about groups. As far as I can understand a semigroup with an identity is a groupoid, and the natural numbers under the operation of addition while it seems to be a semigroup is not a monoid.
WHAT IS THEN A MONOID?
To my understanding a monoid is a semigroup. In a semigroup the only property missing from a group is the inverse property. The elements in a monoid, it is said, need not have inverses. But I do not know why at this point. I will need to read more to see what kind of monoids are out there. The monoid, I know, must have an identity, as there is always an identity in every group. In a monoid as in a group, we have the associative property, as well as, the closure property. Thus so far as I can understand a monoid is a semigroup but as the need for not necessarily carrying inverses is not yet clear to me. I suppose that if in a monoid there are inverses, this is only a bonus. What makes a monoid different from a group is simply that a group has inverses for sure while in a monoid inverses can be absent.
THEN WHAT IS A GROUP?
Simply stated a group is a set satisfying the operations of closure, associative, identity and the inverse property.
SEE ORIGINAL
RESEARCH
GROUP THEORY AN ONLINE COURSE
DEFINITION OF A GROUP
SEE ORIGINAL
RESEARCH
GROUP THEORY AN ONLINE COURSE
DEFINITION OF A GROUP
IDEMPOTENTS AND NILPOTENTS
GROUPS, RINGS, FIELDS AND INTEGRAL DOMAINS
THE ASSUMED OPERATION FOR Z (THE SET OF INTEGERS) IS ADDITION. I AM ONLY PROVIDING THE TABLES FOR MULTIPLICATION for Zn.
QUESTION: WHAT IS A RING?
ANALYSIS: RING
RING: (properties)
Addition properties
1-5 AN ABELIAN GROUP
1. Associative property of addition
2. commutative property of addition
3. identity property of addition
4. inverse property of addition
5. distributive property
Multiplication properties
ASSOCIATIVE RING 1-6
6. associative of multiplication (non associative rings also exist: octonions, Sloane's,A037292, )
OPTIONAL CONDITIONS FOR RINGS:
COMMUTATIVE RING: 1-7
7. commutative of multiplication
(non-commutative rings: Real-valued matrices, quaternions)
RING WITH AN IDENTITY: 1-8 APPLY
8. multiplicative identity ( Some authors required 8 for it to be a ring)
(with no multiplicative identity: Even-valued integers, ) There might be an identity for multiplication but sometimes there is none but if it exists it must be unique. Z6 is a commutative ring with an identity. in Z6 only 1 and 5 have multiplicative inverses. These two elements form form the group of units of Z6. Z6 is a typical ring.
RING WITH INVERSES 1-9 BECOMES A FIELD
9. multiplicative inverses (the integers Z have no multiplicative inverses) might not exist but if they do, they must be unique
SYNTHESIS: RING
For a ring is enough to be an Abelian group 1-5. 6 is the associative property of multiplication. Thus 1-6 will make it into an associative ring. 1-5 will make it into a non-associative ring. 7 will make it into a commutative ring. 8 will make it a ring with multiplicative identity, be this ring associative, non-associative, commutative or non commutative. 9 will make it a ring with multiplicative inverses. In the case 1-8 applies and ab = ba = 0 only if a = 0 or b = 0 will make it into an integral domain. An integral domain has no zero divisor; that is, if ab=ba=0 for a ≠ 0 and b ≠ 0. Finally in a ring -ab=a(-b)=-ab and also 0a = a0 =0 these two properties work as a result of 5. You can use 5 to prove both properties.
Z is a ring without multiplicative inverses. Most elements in most rings do not have inverses.
QUESTION: WHAT IS A FIELD?
FIELD:
1-9 must satisfied.
Q is a field. R is a field. C is a field. Zn is a field for n = prime. Zn is a commutative ring with identity. When n is composite Zn has zero divisors, and thus is not even an integral domain.
QUESTION: WHAT IS A SKEW FIELD?
ANALYSIS: SKEW FIELD
if 7 does not apply it is called a SKEW FIELD
SYNTHESIS: SKEW FIELD
A Skew field is therefore a field whose element are does not commute under multiplication.
QUESTION: WHAT IS AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN?
ANALYSIS:
An integral domain is a commutative ring 1-7 with an identity 1-8 in which ab=0 iff a = 0 or b = 0. An integral domain has no zero divisors, that is if ab=ba=0 iff a ≠ 0 and b ≠ 0. Z is an integral domain. Z is commutative. Z has an identity. Z has no inverses. Z has no zero divisors.
SYNTHESIS:
The set of integers is an integral domain. The set of integers is a commutative ring. It has an identity 1. The elements in the set has no inverses and no zero divisors.
INTEGRAL DOMAIN:
2Z has no zero divisors, but it is not an integral domain because it lacks an identity
GROUP:
A UNIT:
AN INVERSE:
A ZERO DIVISOR:
IDENTITY:
PRIME:
COMPOSITE:
EXAMPLES OF RING:
The Natural Numbers is not even a ring because addition does not have inverses.
Z, Q, R, and C are all commutative rings. They all have multiplicative identities. They are all integral domains. Q,R and C are fields. These are but a few of many fields.
ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS: MODULAR MATHEMATICS (CLOCK ARITHMETIC)
QUESTIONS: WHAT IS AN IDEMPOTENT? WHAT IS A NILPOTENT?
ORDINARY MULTIPLICATION TABLE:
THE SET OF Z (INTEGERS) FORM A FIELD
IT IS A COMMUTATIVE RING WITH IDENTITY 1
(INTEGER MODULO 0?)
THERE ARE NO ZERO DIVISORS. IN FACT, THE SET OF INTEGERS IS AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN, AS IT HAS NO ZERO DIVISORS. This integral domain is a ring only and not a field for in this system division is impossible. This is an example of ring that is not a field.
In integer modulo 0, the divisor is 0 itself. This means we would have to divide by zero to find out answers. However, division by zero is not allowed in ordinary arithmetic. Thus, I am let to conclude I must divide by 1. Dividing by 1 let me to the desired multiplication. For example, 5•5 = 25 and 25 divided by 1 is 25 and this seems to work whenever I multiply any non-negative integer by any other non-negative integer including multiplication by zero. I notice that there is only one idempotent in this system. that is one number satisfying the equation x•x = x, namely 1•1 = 1. Any other observation at this point will have to wait until I can synthesize any further analysis. I must mention that the rational numbers is a field because division is possible there and the integers is only a ring as division does not exists withing the set of integers. This is the reason why the integers does not form a field under multiplication.
INTEGER MODULO 1: (1 is neither prime nor composite)
THERE ARE NO ZERO DIVISORS.
THIS IS NOT AN INTEGRAL: There is no identity 1 ≠ 0 ;1•a = a = a•1
ACTUALLY THE IDENTITY HERE IS 0 AS 0•0 = 0 =0• 0 BUT THIS IS ONLY AN EXCEPTION, ALL OTHER UNITS ARE EQUAL TO 1.
0 ALSO BEHAVES AS A UNIT, BUT THIS IS ALSO AN EXCEPTION
THIS IS THE TRIVIA RING R= 0.
How interesting can be a clock with only one number? The number zero.
Here we could only multiply 0•0 to get 0 and nothing more. According to the rule of idempotent elements we have x•x = x or as I noted above 0 • 0 = 0. Also x exp n = 0 for some n > 0 in this case n=2 we get that 0 is also a nilpotent. There are no nonzero zero divisors. That is, for any a and b in the system ab = 0 for some a ≠ 0 and some b ≠ 0.
We will see the appearance of zero divisor in integer modulo 4 where 2•2 = 0, since 2•2 is 4 in regular multiplication but when dividing 4 by 4 we get 1 remainder 0; thus making (4 = 0 modulo 4) in the sense of explaining the meaning of clock arithmetic.
In integer modulo 1 we are supposed to divide by 1 after multiplying. Example 0•0 =0 and 0÷1 is zero (see ordinary multiplication above with 1 as a divisor only that in ordinary multiplication the elements in the set are infinite.) Also notice that 1 is neither a prime nor a composite number. the following integer modulo is a prime number. Integer modulo with prime numbers give rise to fields. I will explain this later.
INTEGER MODULO 2 ( 2 is a prime number)
THIS IS A FIELD: A COMMUTATIVE RING WITH AN IDENTITY
THERE ARE NO ZERO DIVISORS; this is an integral domain
1 HAS AN INVERSE AS 1•1=1= 1•1; ab = 1 = ba.
THE SET OF UNITS {1} IS THE SET OF NONZERO ELEMENTS THAT HAS A INVERSE
1 IS THE IDENTITY as 1•a = a = a•1
We still have no zero divisors. Two is a prime number. 1 and 0 are both idempotent. 0 is the only nilpotent. Notice there is no need to divide in this modulo by two as the product 1•1 = 1. In the following modulo we will use the concept of division as 2 • 2 is 4. Thus we will say 4 ÷ 3 = 1 or say 4 = 1 (mod 3).
INTEGER MODULO 3 (3 is a prime number)
THERE ARE NO ZERO DIVISORS.
As 3 is prime this is a field
1 has an inverse, 2 has an inverse
This field is an integral domain (including addition)
1 is the identity
Notice that 2•2 = 4 and 4 = 1 (mod 3); this is indeed the first time we need of division to find our answer.
So far as before we have that 0 • 0 = 0 and 1 • 1 = 1. Thus as before 0 is a idempotent as well as a nilpotent. The element 1 is only an idempotent. There are no zero divisors.
INTEGER MODULO 4 (4 is a composite number)
THE FIRST ZERO DIVISOR APPEARS, NAMELY: 2.
THIS IS NOT AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN AS IT HAS A ZERO DIVISOR
1 has an inverse, 3 has an inverse
{1,3} form a group of units for Z4
THIS IS NOT A FIELD AS 4 IS NOT PRIME
THIS IS A COMMUTATIVE RING WITH AN IDENTITY =1 (including addition)
Check this one out. This is the first case in which we encounter zero divisors. That is a•b = 0 yet a ≠ 0 nor b ≠ 0 that is 2• 2 = 4 = 0 (mod 4).
0 is a neilpotent, 1 is an idempotent, 0 is also an idempotent. Also this is the first time I distinguish 2 to be both a zero divisor and a nilpotent at the same time.
2 • 2 = 4 = 0 (mod 4)
2 • 3 = 6 = 2 (mod 4)
3 • 2 = 6 = 2 (mod 4)
3 • 3 = 9 = 1 (mod 4)
Notice that : The remainder is the answer of every product when divided by 4.
INTEGER MODULO 5 (5 is a prime number)
NO ZERO DIVISORS.
THIS IS A FIELD AS 5 IS PRIME
THIS IS AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN AS IT DOES NOT HAVE ANY ZERO DIVISORS
1, has an inverse, 4 has an inverse
{1,4} is a group of unit of Z5
1 IS THE IDENTITY FOR THIS FIELD (including the operation of addition of addition)
Notice that there are no zero divisors in the table. The only idempotents are 0 and 1 and the only nilpotent is 0.
INTEGER MODULO 6
THE SECOND SET OF ZERO DIVISORS APPEAR {2,3,4}
MAKING Z6 NOT AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN AS IT HAS ZERO DIVISORS
1 AND 6 ARE THE ONLY ELEMENTS HAVING INVERSES {1,6} FOR A GROUP OF UNITS OF Z6
Def. a is a unit iff ab=1=ba and 1≠0.
THIS IS A COMMUTATIVE RING WITH IDENTITY 1 IF WE CONSIDER BOTH: ADDITION AND SUBTRACTION FOR Z6
Zero divisors appeared in integer modulo 4. Here in integer modulo 6, zero divisors make their appearance again. From the table, 3 and 4 and zero divisors. 0,1,3, and 4 are idempotents. 0 appears to be the only nilpotent. Impotant is the fact that no zero divisor in the modulo is a also a nilpotent element.
INTEGER MODULO 7 (7 IS PRIME)
NO ZERO DIVISORS.
THIS IS A FIELD AND AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN (including addition)
1 is the identity (multiplication)
one is the only element that has inverse
The first thing to notice here is that there is no zero divisors. The only nilpotent is 0. There are two idempotents: 1, and 0.
INTEGER MODULO 8 (8 IS COMPOSITE)
THE THIRD SET OF ZERO DIVISORS APPEAR.
THIS IS NOT AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN AS IT HAS ZERO DIVISORS
NOT A FIELD AS 8 IS NOT PRIME
ONLY A COMMUTATIVE RING WITH IDENTITY 1
1,3,5,7, HAVE INVERSE
{1,3,5,7,} FOR A GROUP OF UNITS OF Z8
Notice that there are 3 zero divisors {2,4,6}. There are also two neilpotents {0,4}. There are also two idempotents {0,1}. Important too is the fact that 4 is both a nilpotent and a zero divisor.
INTEGER MODULO 9 (9 Is a composite number)
THE FOURTH SET OF ZERO DIVISORS APPEAR: {3, 6}. THIS TWO ZERO DIVISORS ARE AMAZINGLY ENOUGH BOTH NILPOTENT ELEMENTS.
NOT AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN AS IT HAS ZERO DIVISORS
As before 0 and 1 are both idempotents. 0 is also, a nilpotent. 3 is also a nilpotent. 6 is also a nilpotent. Notice that 3 and 6 are both zero divisors and nilpotents.
INTEGER MODULO 10 (10 IS NOT PRIME)
THERE ARE ZERO DIVISORS {2,4,5,6,8}. NON OF THIS ZERO DIVISORS IS A NILPOTENT. THE ONLY NILPOTENT IS 0. THE IDEMPOTENT ARE {0,1,5,6}. NOTICE THAT 6 IS BOTH A ZERO DIVISOR AND AN IDEMPOTENT. SO IS 5 ALSO.
INTEGER MODULO 11
THERE ARE NO ZERO DIVISORS
2 IDEMPOTENTS {0,1}
ONE NILPOTENT {0}
NOTICE THAT THE TABLE LOOKS VERY CLEAN.
IDEMPOTENT
NILPOTENT
THE ASSUMED OPERATION FOR Z (THE SET OF INTEGERS) IS ADDITION. I AM ONLY PROVIDING THE TABLES FOR MULTIPLICATION for Zn.
DISCUSSION
QUESTION: WHAT IS A RING?
ANALYSIS: RING
RING: (properties)
Addition properties
1-5 AN ABELIAN GROUP
1. Associative property of addition
2. commutative property of addition
3. identity property of addition
4. inverse property of addition
5. distributive property
Multiplication properties
ASSOCIATIVE RING 1-6
6. associative of multiplication (non associative rings also exist: octonions, Sloane's,A037292, )
OPTIONAL CONDITIONS FOR RINGS:
COMMUTATIVE RING: 1-7
7. commutative of multiplication
(non-commutative rings: Real-valued matrices, quaternions)
RING WITH AN IDENTITY: 1-8 APPLY
8. multiplicative identity ( Some authors required 8 for it to be a ring)
(with no multiplicative identity: Even-valued integers, ) There might be an identity for multiplication but sometimes there is none but if it exists it must be unique. Z6 is a commutative ring with an identity. in Z6 only 1 and 5 have multiplicative inverses. These two elements form form the group of units of Z6. Z6 is a typical ring.
RING WITH INVERSES 1-9 BECOMES A FIELD
9. multiplicative inverses (the integers Z have no multiplicative inverses) might not exist but if they do, they must be unique
SYNTHESIS: RING
For a ring is enough to be an Abelian group 1-5. 6 is the associative property of multiplication. Thus 1-6 will make it into an associative ring. 1-5 will make it into a non-associative ring. 7 will make it into a commutative ring. 8 will make it a ring with multiplicative identity, be this ring associative, non-associative, commutative or non commutative. 9 will make it a ring with multiplicative inverses. In the case 1-8 applies and ab = ba = 0 only if a = 0 or b = 0 will make it into an integral domain. An integral domain has no zero divisor; that is, if ab=ba=0 for a ≠ 0 and b ≠ 0. Finally in a ring -ab=a(-b)=-ab and also 0a = a0 =0 these two properties work as a result of 5. You can use 5 to prove both properties.
Z is a ring without multiplicative inverses. Most elements in most rings do not have inverses.
QUESTION: WHAT IS A FIELD?
FIELD:
1-9 must satisfied.
Q is a field. R is a field. C is a field. Zn is a field for n = prime. Zn is a commutative ring with identity. When n is composite Zn has zero divisors, and thus is not even an integral domain.
QUESTION: WHAT IS A SKEW FIELD?
ANALYSIS: SKEW FIELD
if 7 does not apply it is called a SKEW FIELD
SYNTHESIS: SKEW FIELD
A Skew field is therefore a field whose element are does not commute under multiplication.
QUESTION: WHAT IS AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN?
ANALYSIS:
An integral domain is a commutative ring 1-7 with an identity 1-8 in which ab=0 iff a = 0 or b = 0. An integral domain has no zero divisors, that is if ab=ba=0 iff a ≠ 0 and b ≠ 0. Z is an integral domain. Z is commutative. Z has an identity. Z has no inverses. Z has no zero divisors.
SYNTHESIS:
The set of integers is an integral domain. The set of integers is a commutative ring. It has an identity 1. The elements in the set has no inverses and no zero divisors.
INTEGRAL DOMAIN:
2Z has no zero divisors, but it is not an integral domain because it lacks an identity
GROUP:
A UNIT:
AN INVERSE:
A ZERO DIVISOR:
IDENTITY:
PRIME:
COMPOSITE:
EXAMPLES OF RING:
The Natural Numbers is not even a ring because addition does not have inverses.
Z, Q, R, and C are all commutative rings. They all have multiplicative identities. They are all integral domains. Q,R and C are fields. These are but a few of many fields.
ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS: MODULAR MATHEMATICS (CLOCK ARITHMETIC)
QUESTIONS: WHAT IS AN IDEMPOTENT? WHAT IS A NILPOTENT?
ORDINARY MULTIPLICATION TABLE:
THE SET OF Z (INTEGERS) FORM A FIELD
IT IS A COMMUTATIVE RING WITH IDENTITY 1
(INTEGER MODULO 0?)
THERE ARE NO ZERO DIVISORS. IN FACT, THE SET OF INTEGERS IS AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN, AS IT HAS NO ZERO DIVISORS. This integral domain is a ring only and not a field for in this system division is impossible. This is an example of ring that is not a field.
In integer modulo 0, the divisor is 0 itself. This means we would have to divide by zero to find out answers. However, division by zero is not allowed in ordinary arithmetic. Thus, I am let to conclude I must divide by 1. Dividing by 1 let me to the desired multiplication. For example, 5•5 = 25 and 25 divided by 1 is 25 and this seems to work whenever I multiply any non-negative integer by any other non-negative integer including multiplication by zero. I notice that there is only one idempotent in this system. that is one number satisfying the equation x•x = x, namely 1•1 = 1. Any other observation at this point will have to wait until I can synthesize any further analysis. I must mention that the rational numbers is a field because division is possible there and the integers is only a ring as division does not exists withing the set of integers. This is the reason why the integers does not form a field under multiplication.
INTEGER MODULO 1: (1 is neither prime nor composite)
THERE ARE NO ZERO DIVISORS.
THIS IS NOT AN INTEGRAL: There is no identity 1 ≠ 0 ;1•a = a = a•1
ACTUALLY THE IDENTITY HERE IS 0 AS 0•0 = 0 =0• 0 BUT THIS IS ONLY AN EXCEPTION, ALL OTHER UNITS ARE EQUAL TO 1.
0 ALSO BEHAVES AS A UNIT, BUT THIS IS ALSO AN EXCEPTION
THIS IS THE TRIVIA RING R= 0.
How interesting can be a clock with only one number? The number zero.
Here we could only multiply 0•0 to get 0 and nothing more. According to the rule of idempotent elements we have x•x = x or as I noted above 0 • 0 = 0. Also x exp n = 0 for some n > 0 in this case n=2 we get that 0 is also a nilpotent. There are no nonzero zero divisors. That is, for any a and b in the system ab = 0 for some a ≠ 0 and some b ≠ 0.
We will see the appearance of zero divisor in integer modulo 4 where 2•2 = 0, since 2•2 is 4 in regular multiplication but when dividing 4 by 4 we get 1 remainder 0; thus making (4 = 0 modulo 4) in the sense of explaining the meaning of clock arithmetic.
In integer modulo 1 we are supposed to divide by 1 after multiplying. Example 0•0 =0 and 0÷1 is zero (see ordinary multiplication above with 1 as a divisor only that in ordinary multiplication the elements in the set are infinite.) Also notice that 1 is neither a prime nor a composite number. the following integer modulo is a prime number. Integer modulo with prime numbers give rise to fields. I will explain this later.
INTEGER MODULO 2 ( 2 is a prime number)
THIS IS A FIELD: A COMMUTATIVE RING WITH AN IDENTITY
THERE ARE NO ZERO DIVISORS; this is an integral domain
1 HAS AN INVERSE AS 1•1=1= 1•1; ab = 1 = ba.
THE SET OF UNITS {1} IS THE SET OF NONZERO ELEMENTS THAT HAS A INVERSE
1 IS THE IDENTITY as 1•a = a = a•1
We still have no zero divisors. Two is a prime number. 1 and 0 are both idempotent. 0 is the only nilpotent. Notice there is no need to divide in this modulo by two as the product 1•1 = 1. In the following modulo we will use the concept of division as 2 • 2 is 4. Thus we will say 4 ÷ 3 = 1 or say 4 = 1 (mod 3).
INTEGER MODULO 3 (3 is a prime number)
THERE ARE NO ZERO DIVISORS.
As 3 is prime this is a field
1 has an inverse, 2 has an inverse
This field is an integral domain (including addition)
1 is the identity
Notice that 2•2 = 4 and 4 = 1 (mod 3); this is indeed the first time we need of division to find our answer.
So far as before we have that 0 • 0 = 0 and 1 • 1 = 1. Thus as before 0 is a idempotent as well as a nilpotent. The element 1 is only an idempotent. There are no zero divisors.
INTEGER MODULO 4 (4 is a composite number)
THE FIRST ZERO DIVISOR APPEARS, NAMELY: 2.
THIS IS NOT AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN AS IT HAS A ZERO DIVISOR
1 has an inverse, 3 has an inverse
{1,3} form a group of units for Z4
THIS IS NOT A FIELD AS 4 IS NOT PRIME
THIS IS A COMMUTATIVE RING WITH AN IDENTITY =1 (including addition)
Check this one out. This is the first case in which we encounter zero divisors. That is a•b = 0 yet a ≠ 0 nor b ≠ 0 that is 2• 2 = 4 = 0 (mod 4).
0 is a neilpotent, 1 is an idempotent, 0 is also an idempotent. Also this is the first time I distinguish 2 to be both a zero divisor and a nilpotent at the same time.
2 • 2 = 4 = 0 (mod 4)
2 • 3 = 6 = 2 (mod 4)
3 • 2 = 6 = 2 (mod 4)
3 • 3 = 9 = 1 (mod 4)
Notice that : The remainder is the answer of every product when divided by 4.
INTEGER MODULO 5 (5 is a prime number)
NO ZERO DIVISORS.
THIS IS A FIELD AS 5 IS PRIME
THIS IS AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN AS IT DOES NOT HAVE ANY ZERO DIVISORS
1, has an inverse, 4 has an inverse
{1,4} is a group of unit of Z5
1 IS THE IDENTITY FOR THIS FIELD (including the operation of addition of addition)
Notice that there are no zero divisors in the table. The only idempotents are 0 and 1 and the only nilpotent is 0.
INTEGER MODULO 6
THE SECOND SET OF ZERO DIVISORS APPEAR {2,3,4}
MAKING Z6 NOT AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN AS IT HAS ZERO DIVISORS
1 AND 6 ARE THE ONLY ELEMENTS HAVING INVERSES {1,6} FOR A GROUP OF UNITS OF Z6
Def. a is a unit iff ab=1=ba and 1≠0.
THIS IS A COMMUTATIVE RING WITH IDENTITY 1 IF WE CONSIDER BOTH: ADDITION AND SUBTRACTION FOR Z6
Zero divisors appeared in integer modulo 4. Here in integer modulo 6, zero divisors make their appearance again. From the table, 3 and 4 and zero divisors. 0,1,3, and 4 are idempotents. 0 appears to be the only nilpotent. Impotant is the fact that no zero divisor in the modulo is a also a nilpotent element.
INTEGER MODULO 7 (7 IS PRIME)
NO ZERO DIVISORS.
THIS IS A FIELD AND AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN (including addition)
1 is the identity (multiplication)
one is the only element that has inverse
The first thing to notice here is that there is no zero divisors. The only nilpotent is 0. There are two idempotents: 1, and 0.
INTEGER MODULO 8 (8 IS COMPOSITE)
THE THIRD SET OF ZERO DIVISORS APPEAR.
THIS IS NOT AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN AS IT HAS ZERO DIVISORS
NOT A FIELD AS 8 IS NOT PRIME
ONLY A COMMUTATIVE RING WITH IDENTITY 1
1,3,5,7, HAVE INVERSE
{1,3,5,7,} FOR A GROUP OF UNITS OF Z8
Notice that there are 3 zero divisors {2,4,6}. There are also two neilpotents {0,4}. There are also two idempotents {0,1}. Important too is the fact that 4 is both a nilpotent and a zero divisor.
INTEGER MODULO 9 (9 Is a composite number)
THE FOURTH SET OF ZERO DIVISORS APPEAR: {3, 6}. THIS TWO ZERO DIVISORS ARE AMAZINGLY ENOUGH BOTH NILPOTENT ELEMENTS.
NOT AN INTEGRAL DOMAIN AS IT HAS ZERO DIVISORS
As before 0 and 1 are both idempotents. 0 is also, a nilpotent. 3 is also a nilpotent. 6 is also a nilpotent. Notice that 3 and 6 are both zero divisors and nilpotents.
INTEGER MODULO 10 (10 IS NOT PRIME)
THERE ARE ZERO DIVISORS {2,4,5,6,8}. NON OF THIS ZERO DIVISORS IS A NILPOTENT. THE ONLY NILPOTENT IS 0. THE IDEMPOTENT ARE {0,1,5,6}. NOTICE THAT 6 IS BOTH A ZERO DIVISOR AND AN IDEMPOTENT. SO IS 5 ALSO.
INTEGER MODULO 11
THERE ARE NO ZERO DIVISORS
2 IDEMPOTENTS {0,1}
ONE NILPOTENT {0}
NOTICE THAT THE TABLE LOOKS VERY CLEAN.
IDEMPOTENT
NILPOTENT
Monday, May 18, 2009
USC MATH DEPARTMENT LINK AND RINGS
You can find the mathworld link at the USC math department related links.
CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW: GO TO ALGEBRA. THEN TO RING THEORY: THEN TO DIVISION ALGEBRA.
YOU WILL FIND ALL ABOUT RING THEORY THERE. ENJOY!
CLICK ON THE LINK BELOW: GO TO ALGEBRA. THEN TO RING THEORY: THEN TO DIVISION ALGEBRA.
YOU WILL FIND ALL ABOUT RING THEORY THERE. ENJOY!
Sunday, May 17, 2009
MAKING SENSE OF MATHEMATICAL RINGS AND FIELDS
https://www3.imsa.edu/programs/e2k/curriculum/68reflections.mod/teaching
Last night was a very productive night. As I went over my old math notes, I came across a lecture on rings. This has been a lecture I'd never understood completely. As I read on, I begun to understand what a ring was. First I understood that for a set to be a ring, certain math properties must apply withing the set. But it all was so confusing until I begun to analyze more carefully. I ask to myself what is this about and how can I understand it? Let's take a look at a most original set of numbers: the set of integers:
..........-1, 0, 1, 2, ............
I found out that this set is a commutative ring and by definition an integral domain as it does not contain any zero divisors. zero divisors came into existence in the study of modular mathematics.
An example of a zero divisor would be 2•2 = 0. Here 2 is a zero divisor as 0 divided by 2 will give us 2 in the modular set : (0,1,2,3) this is called the set of all integers mod4. To give an example if we multiply 2•0 we get 0. If we multiply 2•1 =2 ; 2•2 = 4 but there is no four in this set so 4 becomes 0. Similarly 2•3 = 6 but there is no 6 so 2. Therefore clearly 2 is a zero divisor in the sense that 2 is not zero and yet when multiplying 2•2 we get 0. This makes 2 a zero divisor. Of importance is the fact that in the set of integers there are no zero divisors. The only way we can get a•b = 0 is if a or b is zero. This makes the set of all integer an integral domain. An integral domain is a ring. In particular the set of integers is a commutative ring. The fact that the set of integers has no inverse element such that a• -a = 1 deprives the integers from being a mathematical field unlike the field of the rational numbers where 2/5 • 5/2 = 1. The inverse element in this case is the reciprocal fraction, something clearly missing in in integers which are void of fractions. Thus, finally I got to understand fields and rings.
WHAT IS A COMMUTATIVE RING?
THE SET MUST BE A COMMUTATIVE GROUP: That is the following properties for addition must apply:
CLOSURE PROPERTY OF ADDITION (Magma or groupoid)
1) The result of adding any two members of the set, must give rise to another member in the set. For example: in the set of all integers (a ring) adding 3 and 4 give 7. Clearly, 3, 4, and 7 are integers. Thus adding any two integers will give rise to another integer, i.e; the sum of any a and b is in the set of all the integers. This property is called the closure property. Let a and b be in the set then a+b is in the set.
ASSOCIATIVE PROPERTY OF ADDITION (Semigroup)
2) letting a, b and c be in the set will ensure that (a+b)+c =a+(b+c), that is the associative property applies. (This makes it a semi-group)
IDENTITY PROPERTY OF ADDITION (Monoid)
3) Given any a there exist an element 0 such that a+0 =a. It must be true that in the set you must find a zero element. Clearly we can find the zero in the set of the integers as by definition the set of the integers are the positive and negative natural numbers including zero.
INVERSE PROPERTY OF ADDITION (group)
4) This property says that given any a in the set, there must also exist an -a, and this is clearly true in the case of the integers as every positive integers has its own corresponding opposite negative integer. Example: 4+( -4) = 0
COMMUTATIVE PROPERTY OF ADDITION (Abelian Group)
5) Given any a and b we have that a+b = b+a and this is the commutative property. that is given any two integers we can commute them and get the same answer.
THE SET MUST BE A COMMUTATIVE UNDER MULTIPLICATION TO A COMMUTATIVE RING, OTHER WISE IT IS SIMPLY A RING. The following properties must apply:
CLOSURE PROPERTY OF MULTIPLICATION
1) Given any elements a and b then a•b must be an element in the set. Clearly given any two integers their product is also an integer. Example: 2•3 = 6.
ASSOCIATIVE PROPERTY OF MULTIPLICATION (Seudoring)
2) Given any elements in the set a, b and c; the associative property of multiplication must apply. This clearly is the case in the set of the integers. That is, (a•b)c = a(b •c) This is clearly true when multiplying any three integers. Example: (3•2)•5 = 3•(2•5) = 30.
IDENTITY PROPERTY OF MULTIPLICATION (Ring)
3) Given any element a in the set, a•1 =a = 1•a
COMMUTATIVE OF MULTIPLICATION (Commutative Ring)
4) Given any elements in the set a and b then a•b = b•a: Example -2• 3 = 3• -2 = -6
ZERO PROPERTY OF MULTIPLICATION (Integral Domain)
5) Given any a and b, a•b = 0 or b•a = 0 if and only if a = 0 or b = 0.
INVERSE PROPERTY OF MULTIPLICATION (Field)
6) For any a then a• -a = 1 = -a• a. (This is the definition for a ring to be a field.)
So you see these is pretty neat stuff considering that most people in the world have no idea whatsoever about abstract algebra. But as I always said: Understanding is directly proportional to the way in which material is presented to the world. Seeing what is possible and not possible in the world makes way lot of sense when we consider that not all teachers are philosophers nor all philosopher teachers.
Last night was a very productive night. As I went over my old math notes, I came across a lecture on rings. This has been a lecture I'd never understood completely. As I read on, I begun to understand what a ring was. First I understood that for a set to be a ring, certain math properties must apply withing the set. But it all was so confusing until I begun to analyze more carefully. I ask to myself what is this about and how can I understand it? Let's take a look at a most original set of numbers: the set of integers:
..........-1, 0, 1, 2, ............
I found out that this set is a commutative ring and by definition an integral domain as it does not contain any zero divisors. zero divisors came into existence in the study of modular mathematics.
An example of a zero divisor would be 2•2 = 0. Here 2 is a zero divisor as 0 divided by 2 will give us 2 in the modular set : (0,1,2,3) this is called the set of all integers mod4. To give an example if we multiply 2•0 we get 0. If we multiply 2•1 =2 ; 2•2 = 4 but there is no four in this set so 4 becomes 0. Similarly 2•3 = 6 but there is no 6 so 2. Therefore clearly 2 is a zero divisor in the sense that 2 is not zero and yet when multiplying 2•2 we get 0. This makes 2 a zero divisor. Of importance is the fact that in the set of integers there are no zero divisors. The only way we can get a•b = 0 is if a or b is zero. This makes the set of all integer an integral domain. An integral domain is a ring. In particular the set of integers is a commutative ring. The fact that the set of integers has no inverse element such that a• -a = 1 deprives the integers from being a mathematical field unlike the field of the rational numbers where 2/5 • 5/2 = 1. The inverse element in this case is the reciprocal fraction, something clearly missing in in integers which are void of fractions. Thus, finally I got to understand fields and rings.
WHAT IS A COMMUTATIVE RING?
THE SET MUST BE A COMMUTATIVE GROUP: That is the following properties for addition must apply:
CLOSURE PROPERTY OF ADDITION (Magma or groupoid)
1) The result of adding any two members of the set, must give rise to another member in the set. For example: in the set of all integers (a ring) adding 3 and 4 give 7. Clearly, 3, 4, and 7 are integers. Thus adding any two integers will give rise to another integer, i.e; the sum of any a and b is in the set of all the integers. This property is called the closure property. Let a and b be in the set then a+b is in the set.
ASSOCIATIVE PROPERTY OF ADDITION (Semigroup)
2) letting a, b and c be in the set will ensure that (a+b)+c =a+(b+c), that is the associative property applies. (This makes it a semi-group)
IDENTITY PROPERTY OF ADDITION (Monoid)
3) Given any a there exist an element 0 such that a+0 =a. It must be true that in the set you must find a zero element. Clearly we can find the zero in the set of the integers as by definition the set of the integers are the positive and negative natural numbers including zero.
INVERSE PROPERTY OF ADDITION (group)
4) This property says that given any a in the set, there must also exist an -a, and this is clearly true in the case of the integers as every positive integers has its own corresponding opposite negative integer. Example: 4+( -4) = 0
COMMUTATIVE PROPERTY OF ADDITION (Abelian Group)
5) Given any a and b we have that a+b = b+a and this is the commutative property. that is given any two integers we can commute them and get the same answer.
THE SET MUST BE A COMMUTATIVE UNDER MULTIPLICATION TO A COMMUTATIVE RING, OTHER WISE IT IS SIMPLY A RING. The following properties must apply:
CLOSURE PROPERTY OF MULTIPLICATION
1) Given any elements a and b then a•b must be an element in the set. Clearly given any two integers their product is also an integer. Example: 2•3 = 6.
ASSOCIATIVE PROPERTY OF MULTIPLICATION (Seudoring)
2) Given any elements in the set a, b and c; the associative property of multiplication must apply. This clearly is the case in the set of the integers. That is, (a•b)c = a(b •c) This is clearly true when multiplying any three integers. Example: (3•2)•5 = 3•(2•5) = 30.
IDENTITY PROPERTY OF MULTIPLICATION (Ring)
3) Given any element a in the set, a•1 =a = 1•a
COMMUTATIVE OF MULTIPLICATION (Commutative Ring)
4) Given any elements in the set a and b then a•b = b•a: Example -2• 3 = 3• -2 = -6
ZERO PROPERTY OF MULTIPLICATION (Integral Domain)
5) Given any a and b, a•b = 0 or b•a = 0 if and only if a = 0 or b = 0.
INVERSE PROPERTY OF MULTIPLICATION (Field)
6) For any a then a• -a = 1 = -a• a. (This is the definition for a ring to be a field.)
So you see these is pretty neat stuff considering that most people in the world have no idea whatsoever about abstract algebra. But as I always said: Understanding is directly proportional to the way in which material is presented to the world. Seeing what is possible and not possible in the world makes way lot of sense when we consider that not all teachers are philosophers nor all philosopher teachers.
Labels:
abstract algebra,
DIVISION RINGS,
HAMLETOIS
Friday, May 15, 2009
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
IN PHENOUMENA
ABOUT NOUMENA AND PHENOMENA. Welcome to my blog
NOUMENA : I define Noumena as all that can be perceived by the senses plus all that which cannot be perceived by the senses and define phenomena as all that which can be perceived by the senses. Therefore who can tell? This is all there is to it and that is that? In this sense I agree with Kant when in his Critic of Pure Reason states " How is all knowledge possible?" Be that knowledge apriori or aposteriori or both. All knowledge is possible only inasmuch as we are capable of perceiving it which can be perceived at all. However we would argue; our knowledge, is incomplete therefore void of complete reality. We only know (at most) about the world partially and not totally. Who so ever maintains he/she knows everything is only pretending to know that which she/he does not know. One must then agree with Plato that to know anything, one must see what is and what is not possible in the world.
Hamletois
RESEARCH
KANT
NOUMENA
HAMLETOIS
Hamletois
RESEARCH
KANT
NOUMENA
HAMLETOIS