Last time I was writing about equivalence. After one year I have not changed my idea. The idea of equivalence stands. I have been extremely busy working on teaching math, thus the little time to write. I have been paying careful attention on how to write a doctoral dissertation. That is, how to conduct research and how to write an acceptable paper. I have found out the process simple enough. I even constructed a simple version of a dissertation myself. I have found out I can do my own research on anything and write a decent paper. I have created a small template of it. It all seems to simple to me. Lately I have been working on lesson plans. I have gotten here and there on abstract algebra but I have not been able to advance a step. I have reviewed my own calculus notes to not much surprise. It is abstract algebra which worries me everyday. I wish I had all the time in the world to dedicate all my attention to it.
Saturday, March 19, 2011
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
IN PHENOUMENA
ABOUT NOUMENA AND PHENOMENA. Welcome to my blog
NOUMENA : I define Noumena as all that can be perceived by the senses plus all that which cannot be perceived by the senses and define phenomena as all that which can be perceived by the senses. Therefore who can tell? This is all there is to it and that is that? In this sense I agree with Kant when in his Critic of Pure Reason states " How is all knowledge possible?" Be that knowledge apriori or aposteriori or both. All knowledge is possible only inasmuch as we are capable of perceiving it which can be perceived at all. However we would argue; our knowledge, is incomplete therefore void of complete reality. We only know (at most) about the world partially and not totally. Who so ever maintains he/she knows everything is only pretending to know that which she/he does not know. One must then agree with Plato that to know anything, one must see what is and what is not possible in the world.
Hamletois
RESEARCH
KANT
NOUMENA
HAMLETOIS
Hamletois
RESEARCH
KANT
NOUMENA
HAMLETOIS